SSS · Employment Contract Architecture

Can a penalty clause be written for every breach?

No. A penalty clause in an employment contract that operates one-sidedly against the employee is invalid. Court of Cassation practice requires reciprocity before a penalty binds the employe…

Updated · July 20261 min readCategory · Employment Contract Architecture
Short answer

Penalty clauses that are one-sided against the employee are invalid; reciprocity and proportionality are required. Legitimate structures such as repayment of training costs must also be balanced.

No. A penalty clause in an employment contract that operates one-sidedly against the employee is invalid. Court of Cassation practice requires reciprocity before a penalty binds the employee: the employer has to be subject to an equivalent sanction on the same obligation. The Turkish Code of Obligations (No. 6098) also allows a judge to reduce a penalty found to be excessive, so a disproportionate figure is not applied as written.

So rather than attaching an automatic penalty to “every breach”, draft selectively, around the interest you are actually protecting — confidentiality, non-competition, training costs. Legitimate structures survive when they are proportionate: repayment of training costs stands a far better chance where it tapers with the time served than where it falls due in full on the first day. And a non-compete penalty has to be limited in duration, in territory and in subject matter.

Shall we apply this matter to your situation?

Tell us your specific situation in a few sentences; we'll assess it with the right team.

Get in touch
This content is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Please contact our team for an assessment of your specific circumstances.
Categories
Employment Contract Architecture

The right start means a predictable process.

From the first meeting to completion of the work; let's plan every step transparently.